Markets News
Forex and Market News
$134.84
+0.51%
$2,302.40
+0.2%
$2,289.76
+0.31%
$3,372.01
-0.81%
$258.74
-0.77%
$302.24
-1.29%
$270.28
-0.67%
$234.78
-1.64%
$152.65
-0.42%
$162.69
+0.28%
$39.17
+0.05%
$56.48
-0.32%
$43.88
+0.09%
$225.79
-0.27%
$139.71
-0.64%

The Marijuana Industry Already Knew Growing Cannabis Inside Was Unsustainable


Environment

News outlets around the world covered the Colorado State University study’s dramatic findings, but most of them overlooked a major point: Marijuana producers already knew growing cannabis indoors was unsustainable.

 •  

In early March, Hailey Summers helped publish a study that quantified the greenhouse gas emissions produced by commercial indoor cannabis cultivation. For the next few weeks, journalists called the Colorado State University Ph.D. candidate’s phone nonstop, trying to get an interview about the paper’s findings.    

“I am a nerdy engineer who sits at home and programs all day,” Summers says. “So it has been cool, but it has also been a learning experience. You don’t get professional training on this. I’ll just say that.”

The study, on which she was the lead author, was picked up by media outlets far and wide. “Indoor Weed Farms Are Hotboxing The Planet,” declared Gizmodo. “Cannabis cultivation has an enormous carbon footprint, study finds,” read a headline in Yahoo Finance. Even India’s Hindustan Times ran a story titled “Does Smoking Cannabis Fuel The Climate Crisis?” And although the answer is a definitive yes according to Summers’ paper, she’ll be the first to tell you that’s not exactly news. 

“I didn’t blow the lid off of anything,” she says. “The industry knows. Their electricity and natural gas bills speak for themselves.”  

But the study did finally put a number to what the industry already knew. To do so, Summers created a model that calculated how much energy warehouse growing operations across the country use to mitigate the weather outside. Then she compared those numbers against the grid mix—which sources are used locally to generate electricity, whether hydroelectric, natural gas, nuclear, or coal—to estimate the local greenhouse gas emissions. For a complete picture, the model also incorporated the greenhouse gases created “upstream” in the manufacturing process to produce things such as fertilizer. 

The results? One kilogram of dried cannabis produces between 2,283 to 5,184 kilograms of CO2, depending on the region where it was grown. Put another way, producing one ounce of dried weed is equivalent to burning seven to 16 gallons of gasoline, according to Smithsonian Magazine. Colorado’s variable weather and mixed power grid mean it’s one of the worst offenders. Marijuana cultivation accounts for an estimated 1.3 percent of the state’s total greenhouse gas emissions.    

The easy fix would be shifting from indoor grows—which require massive amounts of energy to power the high-intensity lights that feed the plants, as well as to cool down those lights—to outdoor grows. Doing so could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by as much as 96 percent, according to the study. But making the switch is easier said than done, according to Alex Levine, chief development officer and co-owner of local cannabis retailer and cultivator Green Dragon.

There are security concerns; there are also strict zoning laws. Most Colorado counties also have a ban on outdoor marijuana cultivation, and areas that do allow it are far from needed infrastructure like electricity or natural gas lines. Ultimately, Levine says, regulations have made indoor grows the path of least resistance. 

Even so, there’s a perception that the cannabis industry would prefer to grow indoors anyway. One expert on solar-powered greenhouses, who was quoted by The Weather Network in a story about the study, said that he wasn’t surprised that marijuana’s greenhouse gas emissions were so high because the industry’s massive profits mean there’s little incentive to change. 

Not so, Levine says. “Nobody in their right mind wants to grow indoors. Sometimes you read these articles, and they make it seem like the industry is just, ‘Oh, we’re so happy we are indoors.’ Believe me, no one is happy with a $200,000-a-month electricity bill.”   

While opening up more land to outdoor cannabis cultivation may be the best solution, Levine and Summers both say it’s not the only one. Colorado currently doesn’t have any regulations requiring energy-efficient practices for indoor grows, such as mandating LED lights. Levine also pointed out that cannabis cultivators aren’t eligible for things like the Colorado Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy program which helps businesses finance environmentally friendly improvements, like adding roof-top solar panels, because the program is underwritten by the federal government. And his company knows a thing or two about being green. It was one of the first cultivators to integrate solar-powered greenhouse…



Read More: The Marijuana Industry Already Knew Growing Cannabis Inside Was Unsustainable

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Get more stuff like this
in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.